I’ve walked into schools with makerspaces that look like something out of a tech startup—glass walls, 3D printers, rows of untouched robotics kits. And then I ask the staff, “When was the last time this space was used?”
You can probably guess the answer.
“Well… not really since we got the grant.”
“Our STEM teacher left.”
“We’re hoping to start something next year.”
Meanwhile, down the hall, kids are doing worksheets on topics they could be exploring through design challenges, coding, drones, or hands-on builds.
This isn’t just frustrating—it’s a loss.
A loss of opportunity. A loss of energy. A loss of trust in what education could be.
Over the past decade, there’s been a growing chorus:
“We need more STEM in schools.”
Policy makers echoed it. Parents demanded it. Grant money followed. And schools responded—with 3D printers, drones, robotics kits, and fully funded makerspaces.
🚨 The Tools Are There—But the Programs Aren’t
Billions of dollars have been allocated to STEM education and digital equity initiatives across the U.S. In 2022 alone, the federal government invested over $3 billion in K–12 STEM efforts through the Department of Education and the CHIPS and Science Act.
And yet, research shows that only 28% of schools with makerspaces report consistent usage beyond special events or electives (Edutopia, 2021). Even worse, many teachers say they have STEM materials they’ve never used—not because they don’t want to, but because they’re overwhelmed or under-supported.
A 2019 survey by the Education Week Research Center found that 70% of educators said their school had received STEM tools or funding in the past three years—yet fewer than 20% said they felt adequately trained to use them in meaningful ways.
🧠 Why This Matters More Than Ever
Makerspaces and STEM tools aren’t just “cool tech.” They’re a gateway to real-world learning. When used right, they teach:
- Critical thinking
- Collaboration
- Engineering design
- Creative problem-solving
- Grit, iteration, and confidence
These are exactly the skills students need to thrive in the modern world. And they’re not found in worksheets.
In fact, students engaged in hands-on STEM learning outperform peers by up to 20% on problem-solving assessments (National Science Foundation).
So What’s Going Wrong? (Let’s Be Honest About It)
Let’s stop pretending the only problem is "lack of time." The issue is systemic, cultural, and structural.
1. We Treat Tech Like a Product—Not a Process
There’s a belief that simply acquiring tools is the solution. But dropping a 3D printer into a school doesn’t transform learning any more than buying a treadmill guarantees fitness. Real change requires process, purpose, and persistence.
2. We Train Tools—But Not Mindsets
Most PD sessions around makerspace tech focus on how to use the equipment. But what’s often missing is why. Teachers need help understanding how to shift from content delivery to facilitation, from control to creativity, from planning for perfection to embracing iteration.
3. We Prioritize Testing Over Thinking
There’s still immense pressure on schools to “cover content” and prepare for standardized tests. Makerspace work, which is often messy, nonlinear, and student-led, doesn’t easily fit the factory model of schooling. So it gets sidelined in favor of worksheets and pacing guides.
4. No One Owns the Vision
Many makerspaces suffer from “initiative fatigue.” The person who wrote the grant leaves. The equipment arrives after the buzz is gone. There’s no clear role, no vision, and no leader to carry the space forward. It becomes everyone’s responsibility—and therefore no one’s.
5. Equity Without Access
Even when tools exist in the building, they often remain off-limits to students who need them most. Some makerspaces are only available to gifted programs, electives, or after-school clubs. STEM equity isn’t about buying tech—it’s about building inclusion.
✅ What We Can Do About It (And Why We Must)
Fixing this doesn’t mean reinventing the wheel. It means shifting our thinking, building supports, and committing to the long game.
- Reframe Makerspaces as Essential, Not Extra
In many schools, makerspaces are still treated like luxury items—great to have if there’s extra time, a grant to burn, or someone “techy” on staff. But that mindset misses the bigger picture.
Makerspaces aren’t a bonus. They’re a bridge to relevance. In a world where creativity, adaptability, and innovation are baseline skills, hands-on, open-ended learning should be foundational—not optional.
We don’t sideline gym class because kids need physical development. We don’t remove literacy blocks. So why is creative, cross-disciplinary, problem-solving work treated like an after-school perk?
When schools treat making and design as essential learning experiences, they stop asking, “Can we fit this in?” and start asking, “How can this enhance everything else we’re doing?”
Here’s the truth:
Makerspaces aren’t about tech—they’re about thinking.
Design. Inquiry. Exploration. Collaboration. Resilience. These are the learning goals. The tools just give kids the power to practice them in the real world.
2. Invest in People, Not Just Products
The fastest way to kill a makerspace is to fund the tools and forget the humans.
Schools pour thousands into equipment, but often leave the very people who are supposed to use it unsupported and overwhelmed. Tech without professional learning is expensive clutter.
And let’s be honest: Most teachers didn’t enter the profession to manage firmware updates or troubleshoot 3D printer jams. They need more than a manual—they need ongoing support, inspiration, and a community.
Investing in people means:
- Providing job-embedded coaching, not just one-off PD days
- Creating collaborative planning time to integrate makerspace projects
- Valuing teachers as co-designers of the space—not just end-users
- Celebrating experimentation and giving permission to fail forward
- Encouraging peer mentorship, co-teaching, and professional learning networks
You can buy a laser cutter in a day.
But it takes vision, training, and trust to create a culture of innovation.
People sustain programs. Not products.
3. Build Sustainable Programming, Not One-Time Events
Too often, schools celebrate the arrival of a new makerspace with a ribbon-cutting, a few exciting demo days, or a STEM Week activity—and then momentum fizzles out. The tools remain, but the programming doesn’t.
Makerspaces don’t thrive on novelty—they thrive on consistency.
Sustainable programming means creating ongoing opportunities for students to engage in meaningful, hands-on work. That might look like:
- Weekly design challenges integrated into science or math classes
- Cross-curricular projects co-planned with multiple teachers
- A rotating makerspace schedule that ensures every class gets time
- After-school clubs that build on what’s happening during the day
- Year-long themes (e.g., “Solve a Local Problem”) that anchor learning in purpose
Importantly, sustainable programming also means building internal capacity. If the only person who can run the makerspace is one passionate tech teacher or a contracted vendor, the system is fragile. But when multiple staff members are empowered, curriculum is documented, and the space has clear alignment with school priorities, the makerspace becomes a part of the school’s identity—not an afterthought.
It’s not about doing more. It’s about building smarter, repeatable structures that embed innovation into the everyday.
4. Make It Inclusive, Accessible, and Student-Led
Let’s be honest: too many makerspaces unintentionally become gated communities. I’ve seen rooms full of incredible tech that only a handful of students get to touch—usually the high achievers, the kids in gifted programs, or the ones who already know how to code.
That’s not innovation. That’s gatekeeping with gadgets.
If we really believe in the power of hands-on, creative, project-based learning, we have to make sure every student has access—not just the “STEM kids,” not just the early finishers, not just the ones who raise their hand first.
We need to build makerspace culture that’s:
- Inclusive of different learning styles (some kids are tinkerers, others are storytellers, others thrive in teams)
- Representative of diverse voices (projects should reflect students’ cultures, interests, and lived experiences)
- Open to all ability levels (true makerspace work allows for multiple entry points—no one should be locked out because they haven’t used a laptop or a soldering iron before)
And maybe most importantly: let students lead.
Some of the best breakthroughs I’ve seen in a makerspace came when a teacher stepped back and said, “Okay. Show me how you’d solve this.”
We need to stop treating students like passengers in their education and start treating them like co-pilots. Let them design challenges. Let them run peer workshops. Let them decide what problems they want to tackle.
If you want buy-in? Give them ownership. If you want engagement? Give them a reason.
5. Reconnect Tools to Purpose
A drone is just a flying toy until it’s used to map flood zones.
A 3D printer is just a fancy machine until a student uses it to create a prosthetic hand or a piece of assistive tech.
A robot is just wires and wheels—until it becomes a student’s first experience with logic, perseverance, and pride.
We don’t just need more STEM tools in schools.
We need to reconnect those tools to meaningful work.
Ask yourself:
- What do we want students to learn about themselves when they build something?
- What problems are we empowering them to solve?
- What message are we sending when we put tech in the building but don’t let them use it?
The tools aren’t the point.
The purpose is.
And when students feel that what they’re doing actually matters—that is when the transformation begins.
🚀 Let’s Make the Investment Matter
The funding was real. The tools are already there. And the need for creative, hands-on, future-ready learning has never been greater.
What’s missing isn’t money or materials—it’s momentum and direction.
If we want to prepare students for the world beyond the classroom, we need to make makerspaces more than an idea. We need to make them work.
Let’s turn underused tools into powerful learning.
Let’s give teachers the support they deserve.
Let’s design programs that actually last.
Guild Hall Learning can help you do that.
We activate makerspaces, support educators, and bring hands-on STEM learning to life—with structure, intention, and lasting impact.
By Dave Martelli, Founder of Guild Hall Learning
👉 Learn more: www.guildhalllearning.com
.svg)
.svg)
